丰满少妇人妻无码专区,国产精品无码翘臀在线观看,xx性欧美肥妇精品久久久久久,国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩

Skip to content Skip to navigation

By Matthew Hand
Product Line Specialist
Thomson Industries, Inc
.
www.thomsonlinear.com, thomson@thomsonlinear.com

When machine designers need fast, accurate control over the linear movement of the heaviest loads, they typically choose profile rail linear guides over round rail guides. Profile rails, sometimes called square rails, offer increased rigidity and stiffness over round rail products, as well as high load capacity in a small package. But profile rails can differ significantly in rigidity, load capacity, travel accuracy, smoothness of operation, speed, and come in various sizes and mounting configurations.

Architectural options

Profile rail architectures vary mostly in the shape and arrangement of the rolling elements. The primary options are: double back architecture with ball bearings, double back architecture with roller bearings and double face architecture with ball bearings.

  • The double-back with ball bearings architecture, uses two sets of ball bearings running back to back inside of the rail, providing high moment load capacity. The ball track groove is only slightly larger in radii than that of the balls themselves, which cradles the ball bearings as they infinitesimally flatten under load, slightly expanding the contact area between the balls and the races.

 Profile Rail
Figure 1: Double backarchitecture with bearings

  • In the double back with rollers option, cylindrical rollers replace ball bearings, (Figure 2). This provides even greater stability over the convex balls, which have but a single point contact area, making them slightly more vulnerable to deformation under pressure.

 Profile Rail
Figure 2: Double-backed architecture, with rollers

  • With the double face architecture with ball bearings, rails are much more tolerant of mounting surface inaccuracies, but compromise rigidity and moment load capacity. It uses four bearing tracks, which are deployed face to face on the top of the rail, rather than inside of it (Figure 3). The double-faced bearing arrangement results in equal load-carrying capacity in all directions.

 
Figure 3: Double faced architecture, with ball bearings

Choosing which architecture is right for which application requires balancing tradeoffs in the areas of rigidity, capacity, accuracy, smoothness, size, durability and cost. Other profile architectures do exist but this article is focusing on the industry leaders.

Exploring the tradeoffs

Choice of bearing architecture begins with a preliminary determination of the following information:

  • The mass of the load
  • The location of the load, e.g. placed on top of the carriage or to the side
  • Required accuracy
  • Desired travel life
  • System mounting constraints

The rigidity, load bearing capacity, and tracking accuracy of the double backed architectures, make them ideal for demanding applications including high load industrial automation, machine tool equipment and precision measuring.

For the most demanding of applications, the roller bearing elements would offer even greater advantage. The rollers are more space efficient, which means they can deliver higher load capacity in a smaller footprint, which may be of value in tight quarters.

Many factors affect the costs and the design of a linear guide. For applications requiring the highest rigidity, motion engineers typically specify the double back architecture, using either ball bearings or roller bearings. For applications requiring less rigidity, they might specify what is called double face architecture, which might also be used with either ball or roller bearings. But these might not apply in all situations.

Although, the double backed architectures might, for example be the best high precision, high capacity applications, the double-faced architectures might be better for applications where smooth operation and cost are drivers. There are also ways to configure both these architectures to make them more rigid as well as smoother.

It all comes back to determining what is the intended load and where it will be placed. There are also many selection tools that guide in the selection of the configurations to meet customer needs. Thomson, for example, provides tools that calculate application numbers through a comprehensive set of algorithms and compares results to a database of available technology to determine an optimized solution set.

To further assist design engineers in making the right choices, device vendors such as Thomson, provide design resources, including teams of application engineers who assist in identifying the optimal solution, technical collateral, white papers, webinars and video instruction.

With so many options available, the final choice comes down to the engineers’ judgment and their reading of their customer’s preferences – stated and unstated – which will result in the final design.

back to top 精品香蕉久久久午夜福利| 亚洲精品亚洲人成在线下载| 伊伊综合在线视频无码| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区| 性强烈的欧美三级视频| 亚洲国产av一区二区三区| 中文字幕无线码中文字幕免费| 国产成人精品日本亚洲直播| 欧美大黑帍在线播放| 精品久久久久成人码免费动漫| 国产精品一区二区无线| 日日日日做夜夜夜夜无码| 久久亚洲中文字幕伊人久久大| 永久免费无码日韩视频| 50岁老熟女高潮喷水| 农村熟女大胆露脸自拍| 欧洲熟妇精品视频| 午夜男女爽爽爽影院在线视频| 日产无人区一线二线三线最新版| 亚洲AV永久无码精品国产精品| 国内精品久久久久影院优| 无码国产成人午夜电影在线观看| 国产精品久久久久电影院| 亚洲熟妇无码av另类vr影视| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区高清视频| 久久人爽人人爽人人片AV| 国产精品视频全国免费观看| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲国产一区二区精品无码| 福利一区二区三区视频在线观看| 亚洲日韩亚洲另类| 亚洲色偷偷综合亚洲av| 亚洲VA无码VA在线VA天堂| 中文字幕在线观看| 综合色就爱涩涩涩综合婷婷| 岛国精品一区免费视频在线观看| 亚洲精品成人网站在线播放| 中文字幕乱码久久午夜| 国产在线精品一区二区在线观看| 国产一精品一av一免费爽爽| 韩国三级理论无码电影在线观看|