丰满少妇人妻无码专区,国产精品无码翘臀在线观看,xx性欧美肥妇精品久久久久久,国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩

Skip to content Skip to navigation

By Matthew Hand
Product Line Specialist
Thomson Industries, Inc
.
www.thomsonlinear.com, thomson@thomsonlinear.com

When machine designers need fast, accurate control over the linear movement of the heaviest loads, they typically choose profile rail linear guides over round rail guides. Profile rails, sometimes called square rails, offer increased rigidity and stiffness over round rail products, as well as high load capacity in a small package. But profile rails can differ significantly in rigidity, load capacity, travel accuracy, smoothness of operation, speed, and come in various sizes and mounting configurations.

Architectural options

Profile rail architectures vary mostly in the shape and arrangement of the rolling elements. The primary options are: double back architecture with ball bearings, double back architecture with roller bearings and double face architecture with ball bearings.

  • The double-back with ball bearings architecture, uses two sets of ball bearings running back to back inside of the rail, providing high moment load capacity. The ball track groove is only slightly larger in radii than that of the balls themselves, which cradles the ball bearings as they infinitesimally flatten under load, slightly expanding the contact area between the balls and the races.

 Profile Rail
Figure 1: Double backarchitecture with bearings

  • In the double back with rollers option, cylindrical rollers replace ball bearings, (Figure 2). This provides even greater stability over the convex balls, which have but a single point contact area, making them slightly more vulnerable to deformation under pressure.

 Profile Rail
Figure 2: Double-backed architecture, with rollers

  • With the double face architecture with ball bearings, rails are much more tolerant of mounting surface inaccuracies, but compromise rigidity and moment load capacity. It uses four bearing tracks, which are deployed face to face on the top of the rail, rather than inside of it (Figure 3). The double-faced bearing arrangement results in equal load-carrying capacity in all directions.

 
Figure 3: Double faced architecture, with ball bearings

Choosing which architecture is right for which application requires balancing tradeoffs in the areas of rigidity, capacity, accuracy, smoothness, size, durability and cost. Other profile architectures do exist but this article is focusing on the industry leaders.

Exploring the tradeoffs

Choice of bearing architecture begins with a preliminary determination of the following information:

  • The mass of the load
  • The location of the load, e.g. placed on top of the carriage or to the side
  • Required accuracy
  • Desired travel life
  • System mounting constraints

The rigidity, load bearing capacity, and tracking accuracy of the double backed architectures, make them ideal for demanding applications including high load industrial automation, machine tool equipment and precision measuring.

For the most demanding of applications, the roller bearing elements would offer even greater advantage. The rollers are more space efficient, which means they can deliver higher load capacity in a smaller footprint, which may be of value in tight quarters.

Many factors affect the costs and the design of a linear guide. For applications requiring the highest rigidity, motion engineers typically specify the double back architecture, using either ball bearings or roller bearings. For applications requiring less rigidity, they might specify what is called double face architecture, which might also be used with either ball or roller bearings. But these might not apply in all situations.

Although, the double backed architectures might, for example be the best high precision, high capacity applications, the double-faced architectures might be better for applications where smooth operation and cost are drivers. There are also ways to configure both these architectures to make them more rigid as well as smoother.

It all comes back to determining what is the intended load and where it will be placed. There are also many selection tools that guide in the selection of the configurations to meet customer needs. Thomson, for example, provides tools that calculate application numbers through a comprehensive set of algorithms and compares results to a database of available technology to determine an optimized solution set.

To further assist design engineers in making the right choices, device vendors such as Thomson, provide design resources, including teams of application engineers who assist in identifying the optimal solution, technical collateral, white papers, webinars and video instruction.

With so many options available, the final choice comes down to the engineers’ judgment and their reading of their customer’s preferences – stated and unstated – which will result in the final design.

back to top 亚洲欧美在线x视频| 一区二区三区波多野结衣在线观看| 成人看片黄A免费看| 99国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 少妇高潮喷潮久久久影院| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品青草漫画| 久久被窝亚洲精品爽爽爽| 久久无码人妻一区二区三区午夜| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁2018| 亚洲欧美日韩成人一区| 久久久精品一区aaa片| 免费A级毛片无码无遮挡| 国产乱码一卡二卡3卡4卡网站| 无码精品国产VA在线观看DVD| 中日韩亚洲人成无码网站| 真人祼交二十三式视频| 黄色网站在线免费观看| 日韩精品人妻系列无码专区免费| 四虎国产精品免费久久久| 国产精品久久精品第一页| 精品无码国产自产在线观看水浒传| 精品成人免费一区二区不卡| 国产真实露脸乱子伦| 在线手机视频免费视频| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区毛片18| 国产精华液1区2区区别大吗| 美女视频黄A视频全免费| 久久久久久久精品一区二区三区| 国产a级毛片| 深夜a级毛片免费视频| 一个人免费观看WWW在线视频| 免费无码无遮挡裸体视频在线观看| 亚洲AV综合一区二区在线观看| 国产精品免费看久久久8| 精品少妇人妻AV无码专区不卡| 色欲色香天天天综合网www| 新欧美三级经典在线观看| 99久久精品国产免费| 中文字幕无码日韩专区免费| 尹人香蕉久久99天天拍|